California and San Francisco June 2016 Propositions
50: Yes - makes it harder so suspend a legislator but provides a more impactful sanction when this does happen. I don't think legislators should be suspended unless the circumstances are extreme.
A: Yes - mostly hospital and fire station upgrades.
B: No - I like parks, but the city should decide how much to allocate to them. I generally don't like measures that carve out specific areas for funding.
C: I have no idea. Abstain. I don't have the time to untangle this one.
D: Yes, clearly more oversight of lethal force by SFPD is needed.
E: Yes, brings San Francisco sick leave in line with State rules.
AA: No, regressive per-parcel tax. Should be funded in a better way.
- San Francisco November 2020 Ballot Measures
- California November 2020 Propositions
- San Francisco November 2016 Propositions
You Might Also Like
- Summer Solstice 2022
- Enable GZIP compression for Amazon S3 hosted website in CloudFront
- Bayview Rise
All comments are moderated. Your email address is used to display a Gravatar and optionally for notification of new comments and to sign up for the newsletter.